Watershed moment full#
Watershed moment free#

Watershed moment full#

But then the vote was only 93 countries in favor, 24 against, 58 voted present, and 18 did not vote.Д®ven with the lies about Bucha in full use, support for the US/NATO group considerably waned. Yet on April 7th, the UN General Assembly voted to kick Russia out of the Human Rights Council, based on the news coming out of Bucha (which was NOT the Russians doing, as I started to chronicle, and have information to follow up with). This was hailed, by American spokespeople, as a sign that вЂњall of progressive mankindвЂќ was united, overwhelmingly, against Putin! On March 2 and March 26, the UN General Assembly voted on anti-Russian resolutions, with similar results: 141 and 140 countries in favor, 5 and 5 against, 35 and 38 voted present, and 12 and 10 countries did not vote. Zelensky is making political decisions, dragging out this war for some reason, but at the cost of thousands of lives of his own people, without any perceptible gain or benefit.Д«ut letвЂ™s take a step back, and look at the wide picture. The short of it: the Ukrainian army is at very severe risk of imploding, due to very low morale caused by lack of proper equipment, weapons, support, and leadership. I wanted to start with Ukraine, but that topic ran away from me, a little, as there was too much information I had to include to do that part of the story justice, and had to make that into itвЂ™s own article ( A look at the state of the Ukrainian army ). And now, almost a month later, everyone else is noticing as well, and you can see articles and comments referring to this turning point being reached. Even unrelated (or better: not directly related) things and events start to show signs of radical change. In a true global paradigm shift, everything becomes unmoored. They notice this shift among the culture and the people first.

As is to be expected, among the financial world, who could not care less about politics, but are bound to their shareholders. вЂњ I am telling you: a paradigm shift is happening, and we see the first signs. Enough is enough.вЂќДЄnd I concluded, after citing several other tidbits of news: The boards might be staffed with spineless people or full on activists, but their shareholders donвЂ™t care, and they see the writing on the wall. Do not push the extreme agenda, people are no longer taking it, and are using their power of the purse to full effect. They see how untouchable companies get hammered: Disney, for example, at the hands of the Florida Governor, DeSantis, or Netflix. The big companies have realized, or are in the painful process of coming to grips with this reality, that carrying water for the left is a very expensive activity that goes against their corporate interests.

Watershed moment free#

They did not count on that sudden loss of free corporate advertising and influencing, that is for sure! It also shows how important that is to shape narratives, to give it the appearance of widespread protest, of social importance, even if it is absolutely NOT the case!ДЄnother point to consider: why are those companies, Netflix Zeno, Bezos, now taking such positions? I think a major paradigm shift has happened, that favors the conservative values.

This explains the relative silence on this topic, and how the astroturfing on the left is completely falling flat. The PR firm, Zeno, warns corporations that inquiries from the media about reproductive rights should be ignored to avoid attracting attention: 'eing at the center is not advisable ' To not even mention abortion rights or womenвЂ™s rights, at all! It did so as they warn that the media will demand they (their clienst) take a stand on those issues (of course, in line with the extreme leftist positions).

вЂњ Or this major PR firm that advises major corporations such as Coco Cola, Netflix and Starbucks to avoid commenting on the whole SCOTUS case regarding abortion. In a prior post, вЂњ In Case You Missed It вЂќ, I pointed out the following news: